Bolt action carbine chambered in 7,5x54; it was a simplified and pretty rough rifle but was easy to manufacture and quite robust in service, carried a 43 cm spike bayonet, reversed in a tube below the barrel, 5 round internal box magazine, clip fed (same clips as the IGeL-12), muzzle velocity 803 m/s, standard infantry rifle until 1943, remained rather common until 1946, weight 3,6 kg, length 1'010 mm.

The weapon was developed as a replacement for the various older rifles accumulated during the Second Cataclysm, mainly the straight-pull, en-bloc clip loaded IGeL-12. While self-loading weapons were already in development, the IGeL-35 was intended as interim design and backup weapon, until sufficient numbers of self-loading rifles could be produced. It was probably one of the latest military bolt action rifles to be designed, with an emphasis on mass production, reliability and ease of maintenance.

But what was designed as an interim solution soon proved to be the primary weapon of the Laywenranian riflemen for the next decade to come, being produced in large numbers. Only starting later in the war it was mainly relegated to secondary troops, being replaced by the self-loading IGeL-40.

The lMG-30 was developed as an indigenous replacement for existing two-decade-old light machine guns in the infantry machine gun role. The resulting weapon surpassed the expectations of the commission, being capable of delivering sustained fire for long periods of time. This was in part thanks to the deliberately rather low rate of fire of 450 RPM. Regulations recommended to fire 4 magazines, wait for a short period of time and then repeating the process to ensure continuous fire as long there is ammunition. Otherwise, 400 rounds could be fired uninterrupted before the machine gun had to cool down for 10 to 15 minutes. It was chambered in the standard 7,5x54 mm round, fed by top-mounted 25 round magazines and was well protected against mud and dust. Other variants were available to be mounted in tanks and planes. They both had a thicker barrel, a rate of fire of 900 RPM, an increased weight and 150 round pan-magazines. The standard infantry machine gun could also be fed by belts and mounted on a tripod to act as a medium machine gun. Reserve units used it until 2004.

Development of a semi-automatic rifle already begun in the early thirties but it took the whole decade to create a reliably working weapon. In 1940 it was officially accepted into troop service and large-scale production soon began to replace the bolt-action IGeL-35, though it took a while to equip most frontline units with the new rifle. While it was quite rugged, the first variants didn't achieve the reliability and ease of maintenance of the older bolt-action rifle, but the tremendous increase of firepower was well worth this in the eyes of the Laywenranian military. With the IGeL-40 QL. 2 most of the issues were solved, additionally, the weapon was lighter and shorter while only marginally decreasing muzzle velocity and performance. The rifle was chambered in the standard 7,5x54 mm round and had a weight of 4,5 kg and a length of 1'080 mm in the first variant. The QL. 2 only weighed 3,7 kg and had a length of 1'010 mm while having a muzzle velocity of 820 m/s. While the QL. 0 had an internal 5-round magazine similar to the IGeL-35, the later variants were fed by detachable 10-round magazines and featured a rail on the left side to mount a scope. The barrel had an integrated compensator / rifle grenade launcher, firing the standard rifle grenades. It quickly built a reputation of being capable to endure harsh environments and only insufficient amounts of maintenance.

Originally built as a police pistol, the weapon was adopted by the military, which was in search of a pistol for its officers and auxiliary personnel. To streamline production and unify weapons production, the police pistol was favoured - but it also had other qualities speaking for it. It was chambered in the Laywenranian 7,5x24 pistol cartridge and had an eight round magazine. With a muzzle velocity of 478 m/s and a weight of 0,69 kg, it was a lightweight yet potent weapon, reliable and safe thanks to innovative safety mechanisms. 

The sMG-39 was developed as a heavy machine gun to be used against lightly armoured vehicles, as an anti-aircraft weapon as well as armament for planes. It quickly gained the reputation of being rugged, reliable and heavy-hitting. It fired the newly developed 13x100 mm cartridge, had a cyclic rate of fire of 650 RPM and a muzzle velocity of 827 m/s. As a heavy infantry machine gun it was frequently deployed with a two-wheeled mounting and a single-sheet armour-plate shield, as an anti-aircraft weapon it was mounted on pintle and tripod mounts. It was also mounted on the cupolas of tanks later in the war, armed many Laywenranian planes and could be also found on the ships of the navy. It continued to serve in the Armed Forces for the next 6 decades.

By US Gov (War department) (TM-E 30-480 Handbook on Japanese Military Forces) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The LGW-05 was a light 4WD vehicle with a 30 kW diesel engine and a 500 kg payload capacity. It was used as a reconnaissance vehicle, personnel transport and a light artillery tractor. Thanks to its sturdy and durable construction it was adaptable to a wide spectrum of tasks, essentially replacing all the roles horses previously filled in the army. It had a top speed of 101 km/h and a range of 500 km on the road.

The MT-04 was developed as a small armoured vehicle which should serve in the role of a munition and supply carrier as well as a prime mover. Could load 400 kg of supply in the cargo bay and an additional 700 kg in the armoured trailer.

By Hornet Driver [CC BY-SA 3.0  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], from Wikimedia Commons

The TSh-34, often colloquially known as "Teisha" by the troops, is an Armoured Car based on a request by the army for a light scout car, which should be based on a commonly employed chassis, proof against small arms fire and fielding a light armament. The resulting vehicle was widely used, although being replaced in frontline scout regiments by the TSh-37, mainly being used for garrison and patrol duties, but also for liaison, officer transport and reconnaissance.

• Crew: 1
• Length: 3,7 m
• Width: 1,7 m
• Height: 1,7 m
• Weight: 2'115 kg
• Powerplant: 1 × MAKO LD443 diesel engine, 43 kW
• Armament: 1 x 7,5 mm MG-30
• Maximum Speed: 80 km/h on roads
• Range: 600 km
• Suspension: 4x4

Variants:

• QL. 0 - First production variant
• QL. 1 - Enlarged turret with a 13 mm SMG-39

The TSh-37 was an evolution of the TSh-34 armoured car, deploying on the chassis of the LGW-15. While the first version featured roughly the same armour, the chassis was lengthened and a 25 mm machine cannon installed as the main armament, supplementing the 7,5 mm MG-30.

• Crew: 1
• Length: 4,7 m
• Width: 1,9 m
• Height: 1,7 m
• Weight: 3'936 kg
• Powerplant: 1 × MAKO LD 443M diesel engine, 60 kW
• Armament: 1 x 25 mm machine cannon, 1 x 7,5 mm MG-30
• Maximum Speed: 80 km/h on roads
• Range: 400 km
• Suspension: 4x4

Variants:

• QL. 0 - First small batch production variant
• QL. 1 - Frontal armour increased to 14,5 mm, MAKO LD 443I engine with 75 kW
• QL. 2 - Frontal armour increased to 30 mm
• QL. 3 - Based on the QL. 2, armed with the 30 mm TCAR md. 40
• QL. 9 - Dedicated command variant, only MG retained, additional radios and whip antenna

The LPz-35 was a light infantry tank designed in the early thirties to fulfil the requirement of the army for a tank, which could be transported by lighter ships, be immune to shrapnel and anti-tank fire and deliver fire support for infantry troops. This resulted in the design of an 11 t heavy tank with a crew of 3, armoured frontally with 40 mm of armour, 30 mm at the sides and 15 mm at the rear. It was originally designed to have a weight of under 10 t, but emerging more powerful AT guns led to the requirement for heavier armour. Firepower was provided by the 40 mm L/30 cannon (72 rounds) and a coaxial 7,5 mm MG-30 (2'000 rounds). It was powered by a 60 kW MAKO LD443M Diesel engine for a top speed of 30 km/h and an operational range of 250 km. Height: 2,1 m; Length: 4,5 m; Width: 2,3 m.

Variants: 

• QL. 1 - First production variant (1935)
• QL. 2 - 20 mm spaced armour added to turret and hull front, gun replaced with 40 mm L/45 and 7,5 mm MG added to commanders cupola, stronger 75 kW MAKO LD443I engine (1939)
• QL. 3 - Project mounting an 80 mm gun in a fixed casemate (1939)
• QL. 4 - SPAAG project, mounting a single 13 mm MG in an open-topped turret - while giving important insight to AA tank design, the firepower of the single MG was considered too weak (1939)
• QL. 5 - Proposed project armed with 40 mm TCAR md. 37 conical gun. Due to the small HE shell, the project was dropped - the primary task for the tank was still seen as infantry support (1940)
• QL. 6 - Tank destroyer armed with 55 mm L/50 conical gun, turret replaced with a fixed, top open superstructure (1941)
• QL. 7 - SPAAG, twin 25 mm in a turret (1941)

The LPz-42 was the successor to the LPz-35, intended to fill the same role - infantry support in locations with bad infrastructure and for amphibious landings. Thanks to the sloped armour, the protection was drastically increased, while keeping the weight at 11 t. Frontal hull armour was increased to 45 mm and turret armour to 60 mm. The tank was powered by a 160 kW MAKO LD820 Diesel engine. Height: 2,2 m; Length: 5,1 m; Width: 2,3 m.

Variants:

• QL. 1 - First series, armed with a 40 mm/L60 gun (1942)
• QL. 2 - Armed with a 55 mm L/50 conical gun, tapers down to 40 mm at the muzzle (1943)
• QL. 3 - SPAAG variant with the twin 25 mm turret from the LPz-35 (1942)
• QL. 4 - Armed with a 55 mm L/45 gun (1944)
• QL. 5 - Project mounting an 80 mm gun in a fixed casemate (1942)
• QL. 6 - Self-propelled gun mounting the 100 mm GAL md. 43 in an open casemate (1943)

Based on the requirements for a more heavily armed, radio equipped medium tank, the IKA developed the MP-36. While the frontal armour is also 40 mm thick, the side armour was increased to 35 mm and the rear armour to 30 mm. Together with the greater dimensions, this leads to an increase in weight to 22 t. The hexagonal welded turret fielded 50 mm of frontal armour and 40 mm of side armour, protecting the 55 mm L/45 cannon and the three crew members in the turret. Two crew members were located in the hull. The tank was powered by a 130 kW MAKO LD113 diesel engine. Due to its heavy weight for its time and the rather underpowered engine (only delivering roughly 6 kW/t), the tank had a top speed of only 25 km/h and a range of 150 km, both seen as lacklustre by the Army. Further problems arose due to bad technical reliability. These problems were only solved in later versions and were the reason for the small number of produced tanks and variants.

Variants:

• QL. 1 - First production variant (1935)
• QL. 2 - Introduction of a new 150 kW MAKO LD113I engine, many refinements to the drive system to improve reliability (1937)
• QL. 3 - Tank fitted with 80 mm L/35 cannon, counterweight added to the back of the turret, new 250 kW MAKO LD113T engine and jettisonable fuel tanks added (1940)
• QL. 4 - Tank fitted with 80 mm L/50 conical gun, tapering down to 60 mm at the muzzle, frontal armour increased to 65 mm, only prototype (1941)
• QL. 6 - Self-propelled gun prototype with a 120 mm gun in a fixed casemate (1941)

Due to rapid progress in tank technology and the continuing problems with the MPz-36 a new tank was already in development as the first MPz-36 QL. 2 left the production halls. While employing similar armour thickness the protection was drastically enhanced thanks to the adoption of steeply inclined armour. With a frontal hull armour of 45 mm and a frontal turret armour of 60 mm the tank was impervious against the most common anti-tank weapons at the time of its introduction. With the powerful 80 mm gun, tapering down to 60 mm at the muzzle, it was capable of penetrating all vehicles - except the most heavily armoured late-war tanks - frontally from impressive ranges. Powered by a MAKO LD238 diesel engine developing 380 kW and a torque of 2'200 Nm for a range of 330 km. The tank was controversial at first because it departed from classical tank design and made light tanks more or less obsolete, angering the old cavalry and the main gun was actually seen as too powerful and too much focused on anti-tank warfare and various variants with smaller or shorter-barreled guns were proposed (resulting in the conventional 80 mm TAR md. 41 being mounted in a second variant) but nonetheless the tank entered production with its 80 mm conical gun which made the tank probably one of the few which never were upgunned during the war.

Variants:

• QL. 1 - First production variant (1941)
• QL. 2 - Variant with conventional 80 mm L/45 gun (late 1941), at this time there was no distinct preference for either variant, as the conventional 80 mm gun offered a bigger HE shell but the conical gun offered way superior penetration. Due to this, both variants were built until 1943 (although the conventional variant had a bigger share due to greater versatility and the lack of very heavily armoured enemy tanks), when APDS for the 80 mm was introduced, allowing the conventional gun to surpass the conical gun in nearly all aspects.
• QL. 3 - Many minor changes which were introduced to ease production, simplifying production for many components. Introduced new hatch for transmission for easier access, new tracks with better traction in soft ground and new vision devices for the driver and radio operator/hull machine gunner, heavy SMG-39 could be mounted on a ring at commanders cupola (1942)
• QL. 4 - Smoke launchers were fitted to the side of the turret, improved commanders cupola and sight systems for gunner and commander  (1943)
• QL. 10 - Self-propelled gun with 120 mm THZ md. 35 in a fixed casemate (1942)
• QL. 11 - Armoured recovery variant with the turret removed and a crane added in place of it (1942)
• QL. 12 - Anti-aircraft variant mounting a quad 25 mm TAF md. 39 gun (1943)
• QL. 12 - Anti-aircraft variant mounting a single 40 mm TAF md. 38 gun (1943)
• QL. 13 - Bridgelayer variant (1942)
• QL. 14 - Self-propelled gun with 150 mm THZ md. 34 in an open casemate (1943)

The MPz-43 was essentially an uparmoured MPz-40 with 60 mm of frontal hull armour, 90 mm of turret armour, strengthened suspension and side skirts. The various variants of the MPz-40 still used the old hull - new-built ones to save material and old ones recovered from the battlefield. Combat weight was about 4 t higher than for the MPz-40 which was compensated by the stronger LD238M diesel engine, delivering 450 kW and 2'500 Nm.

Variants:

• QL. 1 - First production variant with 80 mm L/45 gun (1944)
• QL. 2 - Upgunned with 100 mm L/50 gun and counterweight added to the back of the turret (1946)
• QL. 3 - Variant with 20 mm of spaced armour added, giving it protection against most contemporary AT guns frontally, increasing the weight by a further 4 tons, impairing mobility to a certain degree (1947)
• QL. 10 - Self-propelled gun with 120 mm THZ md. 35 in a fixed casemate (1945)

The 50 mm GrW md. 37 was a light infantry mortar designed to replace rifle grenades or at least supplement them, giving a greater range while being heavier and more cumbersome. It was mainly used to provide smoke at small ranges, giving each infantry squad the ability to deploy its own smokescreen. With a weight of only 3,5 kg, it fired a 0,41 kg heavy shell to a maximum distance of about 700 m. Up to 25 rounds could be fired per minute. It was very simple and easy to produce. 

The 60 mm GrW md. 35 was deployed at platoon level to give firepower and deploy smokescreens beyond the ranges of rifle grenades. It was a simple and effective weapon consisting of a smoothbore metal tube fixed to a base plate (to absorb recoil), with a lightweight bipod mount. The 60 mm GrW md. 35 had a normal crew of five men. When a mortar bomb was dropped into the tube, an impact sensitive primer in the base of the bomb would make contact with a firing pin at the base of the tube and detonate, igniting a gunpowder charge, which would propel the bomb out of the tube, and towards the target. With a weight of 19,1 kg, it was light enough to be carried by a single person while the rest of the crew could carry ammunition. It fired either a 1,4 kg heavy HE shell, a WP smoke round or illuminating rounds to a maximum range of 1,7 km while achieving a rate of fire of up to 25 rounds per minute.

Very similar in construction to the 60 mm GrW md. 35, the 80 mm GrW md. 37 was also a simple yet very effective weapon. The 55,2 kg heavy mortar was capable of firing either a 3,3 kg heavy explosive shell to a range of 3 km, a 6,8 kg heavy high-capacity shell to a range of 1,5 km or WP smoke rounds. 

The 120 mm GrW md. 38 was more or less an upscaled variant of the 80 mm mortar developed earlier, serving as primary regimental indirect firepower delivering system. In this role, it was the Laywenranian substitute for infantry guns. Like with its smaller cousin it was a simple and effective weapon. It was brought into and out of position by a two-wheeled limber. It was the heaviest weapon available to the infantry, which still could be broken down and moved by foot. Getting it in and out of firing position took only a short amount of time and thanks to its high rate of fire (20 rpm maximum, 10 rpm sustained) and its heavy shell (16,1 kg high explosive, comparable to 10,5 cm field guns) it was capable of delivering a vast amount of firepower in a short time before redeploying to evade counterbattery fire. Thanks to the simplicity and effectivity of its design it stayed in service for many years to come. It had a range of 450 - 6'200 m and could fire HE, WP and illumination shells.

The 30 mm TCAR md. 40 was developed after both the paratroopers and the mountaineers requested a light-weight anti-tank gun, which could be disassembled into multiple parts for transport by infantry or by other means. The resulting weapon weighted 140 kg in the combat position, mounting a 30 mm barrel tapering down to 20 mm at the muzzle which could penetrate 63 mm at 500 m. It could be disassembled into 5 parts for easy transport. The wheels could be removed, resulting in a lower firing height. The first guns were delivered to the special troops (paratroopers, mountaineers, marines) but later the gun was also introduced to infantry divisions to give some dedicated light-weight anti-tank weapon with sufficient firepower. While it was quite capable to penetrate even heavy tanks at short range the high-explosive shell was lacklustre with an explosive content of only 6 g.

The 40 mm TAR md. 35 was the first dedicated indigenous anti-tank gun built by Laywenrania. It also served as the main armament for multiple tanks in varying barrel lengths. For its calibre, it was a quite potent weapon, outperforming similar sized foreign weapons but at the expense of a quite heavy weight of 570 kg - quite unusual for Laywenranian weapons which were usually quite lightweight due to the difficult terrain. Nonetheless, it was light enough to be quickly repositioned and due to the introduction of APDS shells in the late-war, it was still potent enough to fight most enemy tanks but it was replaced in divisional AT companies by heavier guns with better performance. Performancewise it could penetrate 71 mm at 500 m with its 1,0 kg heavy APHEBC shell, which has a muzzle velocity of 900 m/s. With it's APCR it can penetrate 103 mm at 500 m. With the APDS shell, introduced in 1943, it can penetrate up to 145 mm at 500 m. Other available ammunition included 1,1 kg heavy HE and WP rounds.

The 40 mm TCAR md. 39 was a tapered-bore AT gun mounted on the carriage of the 40 mm TAR md. 35. The barrel tapered down to 27 mm at the muzzle, giving the 0,4 kg heavy APCNR projectile a penetration of 115 mm at 500 m. With 550 kg the gun was slightly lighter than the 40 TAR md. 35 and was mainly used to supplement the 30 mm TCAR md. 40 in use with special troops, giving them an AT gun capable of penetrating heavy tanks at medium distances besides having a heavier HE shell with a weight of 450 g and an explosive filler of 300 g. The normal infantry divisions usually switched directly from the 40 mm TAR md. 35 to the heavier guns like the 80 mm TAR md. 38, which had a greater effect on the target at the price of greater weight.

The 55 mm TAR md. 39 was developed to counter anticipated heavier tanks and even landing craft while still being mobile enough to be moved over short distances by its crew. The resulting gun had a weight of 920 kg and was quite capable of stopping contemporary tanks. During the years of the Third Cataclysm, a variety of ammunition was produced and designed. The first in service was the 2,9 kg heavy 55 mm GEKo QL. 1 AP shell (penetrating up to 107 mm at 500 m but prone to shattering against high hardness armour), which was superseded by the 3,1 kg heavy blunt-nosed 55 mm GEKo QL. 3 APBC shell (penetrating 103 mm at 500 mm and having way better performance against high hardness armour and at long distance). It could also fire APCR rounds with a penetration of 140 mm at 500 mm, an APDS shell with a penetration of 159 mm as well as the usual high explosive rounds. Earlier variants already armed early medium tanks, which had a similar construction although they operated with lower pressures. It later formed the standard armament for light tanks and was also used in some self-propelled mounts. Thanks to the APCR and especially APDS (issued from 1944 onwards) ammunition it was capable of penetrating even late-war tanks from considerable distances, although not always frontally.

The 80 mm TAR md. 41 was already in development before the 55 mm TAR md. 39 was in full production, anticipating the deployment of heavier tanks in foreseeable future. Initial production rate in 1941 was quite low and only in 1942 it was produced in significant numbers, slowly replacing the other anti-tank guns in the divisional anti-tank companies and later even in regimental troops. During the ongoing war, it established itself as the standard gun of the Laywenranian military: as an anti-tank gun, as tank gun as well as field gun. With a weight of 1,2 t, it was deemed quite heavy, but it was capable of penetrating all but the heaviest tanks frontally. The standard APBC projectile with a weight of 7,3 kg and a muzzle velocity of 825 m/s was capable of penetrating up to 140 mm at a distance of 500 m, with the APCR and APDS this increased to 175 and 252 mm respectively. It was also the first gun having a HEAT shell (first iterations could penetrate around 90 mm, the latest versions 130 mm).

The 80 mm TCAR md. 40 was essentially a tapered bore variant of the 80 mm TAR md. 41, having a similar carriage but mounting a simpler shield and having a barrel tapering from 80 mm down to 60 mm at the muzzle. Thanks to this the gun achieved an outstanding penetration of 225 mm at 500 m. With the introduction of APDS rounds for the 80 mm TAR md. 41 the gun was deemed as obsolete, as it was more difficult to produce and required separate tooling lines. Being phased out of production in 1944 it continued to serve until the end of the war.

The 25 mm TAF md. 39 was the naval 25 mm/80 md. 38 anti-aircraft gun adopted for the army which lacked a dedicated gun in that calibre. With a triangular base and a two-wheel carriage, it was adopted for use by the army and widely used on self-propelled mounts as well as within the original towed configuration. The 0,26 kg heavy projectile could be fired to a maximum range of 7,5 km, although the effective range was only about 3 km. The cyclic rate of fire amounted to 385 RPM and the weapon was fed by spiral magazines holding 60 rounds. With a weight of 125 kg, it was quite light while being able to penetrate up to 35 mm of armour at 500 m. Similar to the naval variant it was available in single, twin and quad mounts. 

Like the 25 mm TAF md. 39 the 40 mm TAF md. 38 was an adoption of a naval gun, in this case, the 40 mm/70 md. 36. The gun was fed vertically by five-round clips, achieving a cyclic rate of fire of 250 rpm. In action, it had a weight of 1,3 t while on the march this increased to 2,2 t. Contrary to the naval variant the army only employed towed single barrel variants and the twin variant on self-propelled vehicles. The 0,9 kg heavy shell achieved a muzzle velocity of 880 m/s and had an effective range of 5 km. The ammunition was interchangeable with the 40 mm TAR md. 35.

The 80 mm TAF md. 35 was developed to replace the varying pieces of vintage anti-aircraft artillery procured during and after The Second Cataclysm. With a combat weight of 4,1 t, it was towable by the standard heavy truck of the military. Performance wise it could fire the 7,8 kg heavy HE shell at a muzzle velocity of 834 m/s to an effective ceiling of 10 km. While the first version reached a maximum rate of fire of 20 RPM, the introduction of an automatic loading device increased this to a maximum of 30 RPM. Thanks to the two-piece barrel worn-out liners could easily be replaced and the gun could be deployed from travel to combat position in roughly two minutes. Most guns were fitted with a shield to protect the crew from shrapnel and small arms fire.

By Clément Bucco-Lechat [CC BY-SA 3.0  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], from Wikimedia Commons

The 100 mm TAF md. 40 was designed in the late thirties to supplement the 80 mm TAF md. 35. While the 80 mm gun was a satisfactory gun, deadly against both bombers and enemy tanks, the increasing performance and service ceiling of bombers necessitated the introduction of a heavier artillery piece for home defence. Similar to the 80 mm gun it was based on the naval gun of the same calibre and could share the ammunition. With a weight of 9,5 t, it was more than twice as heavy as the 80 mm gun. The 14,5 kg heavy shell could reach a ceiling of 13 km with early timed fuses and up to 15 km with proximity fuses, being fired with a muzzle velocity of 1'025 m/s. The maximum rate of fire was 15 RPM and in fixed positions, they could be fed by data from fire-control radar for basically automatic operation apart from putting new shells into the feed.

By Camera Operator: SGT J.L. ROBERTS (http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil ID: DMSC9109346) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The 130 mm TAF md. 42 was the logical development from the 100 mm TAF md. 40 and was based on the naval 130 md. 35 naval dual-purpose gun. It could use the same ammunition and it was mostly used in fixed fortifications to protect strategically important targets. In this role, it was also mounted in a twin mount in a lightly armoured turret, capable of firing with a combined rate of fire of 20 RPM. The 32 kg heavy projectile could be fired to a ceiling range of 15,7 km, being accelerated to a muzzle velocity of 1'050 m/s. It was also employed as a coastal gun, but with the advent of SAMs and ICBMs, the gun was deemed obsolete and put into reserve, although some still were maintained as part of coastal installations. Thanks to the very potent characteristics, the AP shell could put the existence of almost any tank at service to a quick end, achieving a penetration of 340 mm at 500 m.

By Vitaly V. Kuzmin (http://vitalykuzmin.net/?q=node/212) [CC BY-SA 4.0  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0) or CC BY-SA 4.0  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Being closely related to the later developed 80 mm TAR md. 41, the 80 mm GAL md. 38 fired the same ammunition although with a lower muzzle velocity due to the shorter barrel. While the TAR md. 41 was specialised for the AT duty, the GAL md. 38 was better suited for indirect fire roles. With an elevation of up to 80°, it could be used as howitzer as well as cannon, firing the 7,9 kg heavy HE shells with a muzzle velocity of 650 m/s to a range of 14 km.

The 80 mm GALS md. 39 was a Laywenranian mountain howitzer with a calibre of 80 mm. It had a weight of 455 kg and could be broken down into eight pack-loads, with the heaviest part weighing 95 kg. 

It can fire it's 6 kg heavy HE shell with a muzzle velocity of 450m/s and achieves a range of 8 km.

Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1993-043-13 / Kolb / CC-BY-SA 3.0 [CC BY-SA 3.0 de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/de/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons

The 100 mm GAL md. 43 is a field gun based on the 100 mm/50 md. 30 naval gun and was from the onset designed to work as both anti-tank and field gun. With a weight of 3,5 t, it was way heavier than the 80 mm TAR md. 41 but also capable of disabling even the heaviest tanks fielded during the war with a penetration of 220 mm at 500m with APBC, 285 mm with APCR and 310 mm with APDS. A HEAT shell was available although rarely used, achieving a penetration of 125 mm in the first iteration and later 160 mm. Compared to the THZ md. 35 it had a less powerful round (15 kg compared to 25 kg) but it achieved a higher rate of fire (almost twice as fast) and was more mobile.

[Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The 120 mm THZ md. 35 with a weight of 6,5 t was developed at the same time as the 150 mm THZ md. 34, with the decision being taken to unify the carriage of both weapons, which led to slight delays for the 120 mm gun, as it had to be adapted to the new carriage. While it was also classified as cannon howitzer with an elevation of 70°, it was mostly used in low-angle indirect fire roles against enemy objects. For use against tanks, it was equipped with an AP shell, which was, despite the shortcomings of the gun in the AT role, quite deadly, having a penetration of 175 mm at 500 m. Meanwhile, the primary HE shell with a weight of 22 kg achieved a range of 20 km with a muzzle velocity of 725 m/s.

By Unknown - Vojenské dějiny Československa, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5775623

The 150 mm THZ md. 34 was an entirely new design, intended to replace the wild collection of heavy artillery guns the Laywenranian Army acquired during The Second Cataclysm. From the outset, it was designed for motorised transport with pneumatic wheels. As a cannon howitzer, it could be used in both firing profiles, achieving a maximum range of 19 km with a muzzle velocity of 720 m/s with the 45 kg heavy HE shell. The quite substantial range came at the price of a weight of 7,0 t though. Due to the excellent characteristics, the gun stayed in service for a long time after the war. While being no perfect AT gun it had an AP shell capable of penetrating of 160 mm at 500 m and the HE shell itself was dangerous to most enemy tanks.

By Bundesarchiv, Bild 101I-163-0319-01A / Bauer / CC-BY-SA 3.0, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5476311

The RPW series of rocket launchers war more or less only a set of rails, which could be mounted on a variety of trucks and tanks. They were available in 80 mm with 48 rails, in 120 mm with 24 rails and 300 mm with 12 rails. Though they lacked the sustained firepower of conventional artillery, they could deliver an enormous amount of firepower in a short amount of time, quickly retreating and evading counter-battery fire.

RIA Novosti archive, image #303890 / Zelma / CC-BY-SA 3.0 [CC BY-SA 3.0  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons